Southern Grand Classification Failure

Discussion in 'Trapshooting Forum - Americantrapshooter.com' started by oleolliedawg, Mar 24, 2015.

  1. oleolliedawg

    oleolliedawg Mega Poster Founding Member

    Having just returned from the Southern Grand late last night I want to say it was nothing but a pleasant experience. Perfect weather, challenging targets and wonderful people managing the shoot.

    Unfortunately, one incident kinda puzzled me. It seems one member of the ATA All-American team with a solid class A Singles average last year was classified D Singles. This fine shooter proceeded to break a 100 on Monday and moved up to C and then broke 99 on Tuesday moving up to B. Understandably, the shooter shot poorly on their last 800 targets but maybe the known ability rule should have been enforced in this particular case.

    Does anyone believe under any circumstances an ATA All-American from the previous year should be classified D?
     
  2. oldphart

    oldphart Mega Poster Founding Member

    I donot believe that an ATA All-American solid "A" from the previous year should be classified as"D". That being said it is in the eyes of the classifier, either the classifier knew the shooter and gave him /her a break or did not know the shooter or his/her record and classified him/her on the last 800 targets which were probably shot under not the most ideal conditions. In any instance you would think that the shooter would have enough integrity to have himself/herself classified according to their ability.

    It is also a wonder that nobody complained especially after the 100 broken on the Monday. You would also think that the shooter would have been moved to "A" after the first 100 and a prior record check, but again that appears to be the breaks some get other do not.
     
  3. iowa guy

    iowa guy Mega Poster Founding Member

    Leondis, If I'm right the shooter was Douglas Damron. He won the High Vet award on monday. The fact that he was classified in D really didn't have impact on the other D shooters. We wasn't listed as Winner or Runner Up in C on Tuesday. EDIT - Douglas Damron was not the shooter in question. Sorry Douglas!!! EDIT

    All American status is determined on points and I believe only top 6 points shoots are counted. So, a person could shoot less than AAA/AA scores for an average and peak at the right time racking up AA points.

    Ollie's question was should an AA member of the prior year ever be classed as a D shooter. I don't know. With the Vet/Sr Vet teams going as deep as they do there can be a big change from year to year. Why make a rule to artibitrarily punish someone for their past accomplishments.

    Should this person have been classed a little higher? Probably so. It seems we let the computers do the classifying these days without looking at the paper cards any longer. The cards have had 4 years of history on them for quite a while. A quick look at this persons card would have revealed a fairly solid A average for the past 4 years.

    Fortunately no true D shooter was omitted from a trophy due to the classification of this person.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2015
  4. Leonidas

    Leonidas Mega Poster Founding Member

    http://www.rjstuart.com/Trophies/2015/sgrand.htm

    Iowa guy, I went back and checked and seen my mistake so I removed my post. Apologies if I offended anyone innocent.

    But I will ask how the same shooter (D class) can win the first two singles events and be runner up in the last two and not be advanced for the first two class wins?
     
  5. wpt

    wpt Forum Leader Founding Member Forum Leader

    Brown nosing and good suction ... I wasn't even there and can tell you that much ... WPT ... (YAC) ...
     
  6. Bat

    Bat Mega Poster

    Leonidas,

    I'm just guessing here based on experience at other shoots, so take it FWIW.

    I think this is a big problem with larger ATA shoots, and it is not handled consistently from shoot to shoot. My guess is that this guy did not move up in Class simply because he did not win a trophy in his class - due to winning or tying in his Category. I do not believe it should be handled this way, and some bad results occur in the Championship events because of it. If you shoot a score that is at least equal to your Class' winning score, you should get bumped just like the guys that tied for the Class trophy and lost. You shouldn't be able to avoid a Class bump in B Class just because when you shot a 100 you won Vet! That is crazy. You are still a B Class shooter that broke 100 straight that day, and should be treated accordingly.

    Every Category shooter is also a Class shooter, and they shouldn't be able to remain in a lower Class after shooting Class winning (or many times higher) scores in the prelim days.

    Some thought has go into the wording describing the issue in the programs.
     
    Roger Coveleskie likes this.
  7. Wishbone

    Wishbone Mega Poster

    Wasn't Douglas Damron classified AA? I am not sure how he got dragged into this.
    From RJ's page the HOA ranking 801429 DAMRON DOUGLAS E 876 AA VET

    Ollie can clarify this for himself but I expect the shooter in question was a Lady.
     
  8. Hap MecTweaks

    Hap MecTweaks Moderator

    The programs state; "Class winners will be advanced to the next highest class, for the next like event."

    In such cases with all the class and categories, score should also advance a shooter posting higher scores than his/her class winner!

    HAP
     
    wpt likes this.
  9. Bat

    Bat Mega Poster

    That's the way I look at it too. I think PA used to (or still does) have pretty good wording in their programs.
     
  10. Wishbone

    Wishbone Mega Poster

    The shooter in question did advance from "D" to "C" to "B" per the OP.
     
  11. Bat

    Bat Mega Poster

    Yes, Wishbone. Got off on a tangent, Leonidas was talking about a different person.
     
  12. Leonidas

    Leonidas Mega Poster Founding Member

    Wishbone, this is a different shooter. Go to the shoot link I provided and check winners in D class singles for the whole shoot.

    Every place I have shot the rules (also enforced) were if you won your class you advanced to the next highest class in 16's and doubles.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2015
  13. iowa guy

    iowa guy Mega Poster Founding Member

    Wishbone, that was my assumption based on the following: AA in 2014, 100 in Monday's singles, 800 targets in current year with a low average.

    If I am wrong I apologize to Mr Damron. Maybe Olliedawg should have been more clear.

    edit
    I did look at it. Probably was Tiffany Decker he was referring to.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2015
  14. Bat

    Bat Mega Poster

    Leonidas,

    To me, in the days prior to the Category growth and changes to rules for Class/Cat availability, it was usually - if your score was at least high or tied for your class you got bumped. If I was B Class and won the Prelim Singles Champion w/100, I would get bumped even though I didn't actually win the Class B trophy. Now with the new Cat rules it is really a mess.
     
  15. Wishbone

    Wishbone Mega Poster

    Leonidas
    Yes that gentleman did well for himself in "D" class.

    He might deserve his own thread to keep things less confusing.

    The rule was enforced in some cases but not in his case obviously.

    Perhaps he wasn't bumped because of category shooters in "D" class with higher score?
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2015
  16. Leonidas

    Leonidas Mega Poster Founding Member

    Whishbone.

    I can see what you are saying but to me the category shooter should be out of the picture with his win in category.
     
  17. dr.longshot

    dr.longshot Grudge Match Champion Founding Member Forum Leader Grudge Match Champion

    It was not Doug Damron, he was Class AA in High Overall, and High All Around, he was never in class D at the Southern Grand, It must have been someone else Olliedawg was talking about.
     
  18. leftout

    leftout Well-Known Member Founding Member

    I think you should check the program. Most large shoots have preliminary days and class wins don't get bumped. Monday and Tuesday were prelim days. Bumps started on Wed. Page 6 #1.

    Before you start ripping it helps to know the rules.

    Lefty
     
  19. oleolliedawg

    oleolliedawg Mega Poster Founding Member

    So I see Stuart was wrong re-classifying an A Singles shooter from D class to B class in preliminary events and said All-American team member should have remained in class D for the remainder of the entire shoot. That, even though said shooter maintained a high A average for the entire 2014 season. Surprisingly to some the program states on page 1 the tournament started on Monday March 16th at 9AM-not Wednesday March 18th.

    No matter, if I was classified AA-which I was-I would be embarrassed to be placed in D class regardless of circumstances and would have questioned the classifier. Under the circumstance, Stuart was correct upgrading the shooter within the rules!
     
  20. leftout

    leftout Well-Known Member Founding Member

    I am not saying classifying didn't make a mistake and I don't know his or hers circumstances. Stuart does what he wants, he doesn't always know the current rules. Nobody uses the paper card anymore and I don't what info pops up on the screen.

    Lefty
     
  21. Bat

    Bat Mega Poster

    Leftout, you are correct that you need to check the program. That said, you need to realize most shoots start the bumps in the preliminary days, by which I mean the days preceding the start of the HOA. Sometimes the very early days are not included in the bump. Terminology varies, the bump process varies etc. etc., etc. Just make sure the program is clear in how it applies so there are no questions about who gets bumped even if they have to take a Cat trophy.
     
  22. oleolliedawg

    oleolliedawg Mega Poster Founding Member

    The situation WAS brought to Stuarts attention and the correct determination was made according to him by reviewing the records and rules again!
     
  23. Hap MecTweaks

    Hap MecTweaks Moderator

    Didn't we have a huge brew ha-ha when one of our Australian friends shot at the Grand, then at the CC and was badly misclassified or put on the wrong yardage? Anyone recall that mix-up?

    HAP
     
  24. Leonidas

    Leonidas Mega Poster Founding Member

    If memory serves me correctly the Aussie told them about their correct yardage (I think yardage gain from the Grand) and the classifier said he was going from the computer yardage which hadn't been updated yet.
     
  25. oleolliedawg

    oleolliedawg Mega Poster Founding Member

    I think Stuart does enough of these shoots to know far more about the rules than most anyone else!
     
  26. deepbackwood

    deepbackwood Member

    So did Stuart do the classifying? Are you saying Stuart is negligent is his duties if so?
     
  27. Ron Burdick

    Ron Burdick Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Stuart has nothing to do with the classifying. That is done by a member of the CHC.

    Ron Burdick
     
  28. leftout

    leftout Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Well Mr. Dawg he didn't know the shell speed rule and removal of the dram in the rule at the Dixie. Shoot management and Stuart had shooter with 4 shots to go told his shells were illegal. Some super intelligent nosey old fart took in his hulls, which he went onto field to get( he wasn't supposed to be there). Complained they said 3 1/4 dram therefore illegal in his mind and mgmt also, they were set to DQ him. Until someone with a brain told mgmt and Stuart to read a new rule book. The shell boxes were marked 1260 fps, perfectly legal shell under the new rules.

    Lefty
     
  29. oldphart

    oldphart Mega Poster Founding Member

    According to what has been stated above Stuart re-classified the shooter in question after it was brought to his attention. Again after what was stated above the shooter in question was classified by a member of the Central Hendicap Committee, if this is correct a very large mistake in original classification was made. Computers are a wonderful thing but sometimes we relie on computers too much, the old saying garbage in gargage out. So much for that.
     
  30. oleolliedawg

    oleolliedawg Mega Poster Founding Member

    Stuart has nothing to do with shell speed rules but can mark "dq"on the shoot report as per a decision by shoot management. Not his call!

    I'm sure if he was in classification he wouldn't have allowed an All-American to participate at a Satellite Grand in class D with a previous year A class average!
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2015
  31. iowa guy

    iowa guy Mega Poster Founding Member

    Is there anything in his system that would indicate the shooter was prior year All American? Is there any display of prior year averages in his system? If the answer to those questions are both 'NO' and the classifier 1) used only the computer to classify, and 2) didn't know the shooter was a prior year All American how would you know to classify other than what's on the screen? Of course the answer is to read the paper card and review the prior year averages, but all too often that's not being done today.
     
  32. oleolliedawg

    oleolliedawg Mega Poster Founding Member

    Previous year averages are in the computer. How else can one classify if the shooter failed to shoot a target in the current year?
     
  33. iowa guy

    iowa guy Mega Poster Founding Member

    Ollie, it was a question and thanks for the answer. To answer your question, review the paper card, either current year or last year's card. What ever did we do pre computers?