WHERE'S THE BEEF? (n1h1)

This is a whisper to n1h1.. On an earlier post or two you said there was slander and libel on the site. After you were called out you kinda said it ended or something like that.

My question to you n1h1 is WHERE IS THE BEEF?

I have enjoyed just reading the site but the cowardly act of that insinuation was over the top. So here I am posting only to ask n1h1 to point to the beef. Or was that just a cowardly post?

VIC ​

 

Next thing you know, you will see charts, graphs etc showing who, what, where , then all of a sudden it will be gone ... I stifled the mental midget some time ago by blocking him so he will never be seen or heard from again by me ... I do feel sorry for his dog but have no use what so ever for him and do not like his suck up ass one little bit ... WPT ... (YAC) ...

 

Dysinger was right

 

Soybean?

 

On Aug. 21, 2018, N1H1 told me: "I am happy to talk with you here, however, since you apparently need a strong cup of truth."

So, I replied to the N1H1, that since he thought I needed a strong cup of truth, and since he told me that he would be happy to talk to me, that he could teach me the truth by answering the following questions.

"Neil, do you agree with the following - a simple yes or no will suffice."

• Was the move to Sparta supported by a majority or a super majority of the active and the lifetime members?
• Was there a move by date legally imposed on the ATA?
• Was Pull2012 supported by the majority of the membership?
• Does ATA management have a well thought-out business and strategic plan for growing the ATA?
• Does the ATA have stretch goals for the organization?
• Does each member of the EC and the ED have stretch goals that support the ATA goals?
• Does each of the EC members and the ED have goals identify who is going to do what by when? Is actual versus planned performance reviewed at least quarterly with corrective action plans to get actual to meet or exceed the stretch goals?
• Do you agree that management must take the first step to reverse the decline in an organization?
• Do you agree that management has to be willing to take a good look at themselves to determine how their decisions and attitudes contributed to the decline?

It's now September 21, 2018 and I have yet to receive answers from N1H1 to my questions. I guess N1H1 wasn't happy to talk with me after-all.

P.S: N1H1 also told me: "There is no lack of trust between ATA shooter and the ATA."

N1H1 and the EC are still in denial. When the EC asked the members for their input and then totally ignored their input and did the exact opposite, the EC created a huge trust issue.

Maybe it's N1H1 that needs a strong cup of the truth.

 

Garry,
I applaud you for having the stones to ask such questions of someone who is totally wrapped up and sucks up to the BOD, and EC .... Due to the amount of questions and the relativity they have to the ATA in more than one particular area of the Association he is probably making a few charts and graphs to convince you that he is always right and there is nothing to dispute so the questions you asked have no substance to them what so ever and are not in any way relevant ... That or he has no intention of answering the questions you presented for him to answer ... The ATA and those who suck up do not like when any body asks questions that the answers to can reflect a less then shining light on the actions of those involved or that the questions were asked about ... Just so you know N1H1 is in the Minnesota Hall of Fame, no body is really sure why other than he is a suck up and he votes the way those on the EC always told him to vote without regard to there being any benefit to the Organization or Membership ... In case you didn't know there is a blocking feature on the site that eliminates having to be subjected to him and or any of his BS, I can attest that it works really well ... WPT ... (YAC) ...


There is a CUP of TRUTH for him to choke on ...

 

I think the refusal to answer is an answer. I bet others do as well.

 

AND when you ask you will get this reply (excerpt):

Dear sir:
We feel we can't answer all questions posed to us, as there are many. The general membership will be notified on a "Need to know" basis.

 

Which is more believable the EC and ATA leadership or the women claiming sex harassment against Kavinaugh?

 

Gee Brad, I guess I don't get the comparison.

 

Gee Jake, Both are full of shit is my point and untrustworthy. They are fibers to the extreme, I'm just not sure which are worse.