Someone please explain how your face is not allowed in the OSTA HOF but your name is ok at certain times. Just trying to make sense of the recent decision by the OSTA. We need more information on this. I report. You decide. merlo out.
True merlo As I understood the meeting last night, the OSTA Board, made the decision. They changed the bylaws to allow this for. It was weird that those in attendance heard a very lengthy speech by the selection committee and almost nothing from the OSTA BOD. There will be an empty space on the wall without that person’s face. Using the name on literature will be OK.
why would someone want to visit a HOF to see something that cant be seen? odd. its like going to a museum of modern art, just to read about the paintings purpose with no painting displayed.
The OSTA Board has come a long way. How do they explain that the space on the wall was where we put Jimmy? That was before. . The empty space is reserved just in case a new board likes him.
At the Cardinal Center. Sounds like they were removing pictures of a member and planning to remove others.
Sounds like they better slack off on the pizza and dbl. cheeseburgers. That gut is effecting their reasoning ability
Removing his picture not only shows the boards and the selection committee's lac of reasoning ,but also their ignoring the responsibility expected of them when they agreed to serve the shooters of Ohio. There is nothing subjective after a person is forever enshrined. Enshrinement is absolute and permanent (forever). Dave Berlet
Partly in and partly out will still get a girl mostly pregant. Makes no sense. Fence setting and then lying about it. The true mark of great leadership.
possibly possibly not This reminds me of a topic that was spoken about by one of our great intellects as to if there was a difference between genius and stupid. He explained that there is limitations to genius, but stupid is limitless. Dave Berlet